COMMUNITY OF OWNERSHIP & INTEREST

Definition: Community of Ownership & Interest .

DEFINITION: 

Community of Ownership and Interest: (compound noun/proposition) an all-inclusive collective/community of people, individuals and groups, who in any way have multi layered relationships with a place or cultural landscape and/or the operation of an institution, organisation or establishment – typically a network. 

Usage and context: cultural geography; civic and environmental planning; and community administration 

REFERENCE: Dr Bill Boyd, SCU et al 

CONTEXT NOTE: Used in opposition to ‘stakeholder’: one who has a legitimate interest, stake and/or pecuniary interest in an enterprise, endeavour or entity. Also used to demonstrate inclusivity as opposed to the exclusive implications attached to ’stakeholder’. 

THE CONCEPT

Communities of people have many items in which they share a sense of 

ownership - for example roads, schools, a health service, even a landscape. 

Those with such an interest form the Community of Ownership and Interest – 

its COI – for those items. . 

All too often a COI's shared ownerships and interests are down played and may even 

be belittled or denied –particularly when contentious or complex issues are involved.

 However, recognising the layerings of ownerships and interests, and the social 

cum cultural dynamics involved, can offer a way forward in dispute resolution plus 

better, and more inclusive, understandings of 'place'. 

If we listed items that had a COI we would include items and locations that were 

owned by the public – public places and spaces – such as:

•   A park;    •   A river;   •   A monument ;    •   A memorial;    •   An institution; 

•   A heritage building;    •   A museum;    •   A water supply;    •   A forest; 

•   A festival;    •   A ritual; 

clearly the list is as endless as the kinds of attachments people have for places, 

things and events.

And then there is the issue of 'cultural property' and 'cultural knowledge' 

where there are subliminal layers of 'cognitive ownerships' that increasingly come 

into play with the changing ways Indigenous cultural material –  Australian & other – 

is currently being understood. 

Indeed, individuals within a place’s/event's/space's/knowledge system's COI will 

almost certainly have multiple layers of ownership and interest in it. The ‘truth’ in 

the ownership and interest here is ‘cognitive,’ a matter of ‘lore’ rather than ‘law’ – 

that which is taught; hence to do with wisdom; concerning cultural knowledge, 

traditions and beliefs. 

It pertains to cognition, the process of knowing, being aware, the acts of thinking, 

learning and judging. If we take a museum as an exemplar, museums are to do with 

cognition – musing; the contemplative; the meditative. If we look at courts, then 

they are to do with power over conduct; enforcement and authority; control and 

regulation, guilt and innocence – none of which have a place in musing places, 

nor much to do with musing. 

Furthermore, members of the COI should be understood as having both rites and 

obligations commensurate with their claimed ownership, expressed interest and their 

relationship to the institution and its overall enterprise. 

A member of the COI may also be referred to as a “stakeholder” but 

stakeholdership in its current usage has generally come to mean a person, group, 

business or organisation that has some kind vested or pecuniary interest in 

something or a place. 

Typically, 'stakeholders' assert their rights when there is a contentious decision 

to be made. However, 'stakeholders' are rarely called upon to meet or 

acknowledge an obligation. 

Conversely, members of a COI will have innate understandings of the 

obligations that are expected of them and the rights they expect to enjoy – 

indeed, there are likely to be stakeholders in the COI mix. 

It is just the case that for an institution say, the COI mix, when assessed from

 outside, is intentionally, functionally and socially more inclusive. That is more 

inclusive than say a list of stakeholders drawn up in respect to a development 

project that governments – Local, State & Federal – typically make decisions 

about. 

Stakeholder groups and Communities of Ownership and Interest are concepts 

with kindred sensibilities – law and lore, the former reinforcing the latter. 

Nonetheless, they engage with different community sensibilities; with different 

expectations and different relationships – even if sometimes many of the same 

people have a ‘stake’ in something as well as other relationships as a member 

of a COI.