PRESS

Macquarie Point will have 'MONA effect': Gutwein
Hamish Geale By Hamish Geale
Updated January 17 2023 - 4:29pm, first published 4:15pm
Former premier Peter Gutwein (right) discusses Tasmania's AFL bid with Launceston developer Errol Stewart. Picture by Phillip Biggs
Former premier Peter Gutwein says a new stadium at Macquarie Point would have a "MONA effect" on the state, and urged Tasmanians to rise above parochialism in pursuit of an AFL licence.
The state's bid for an AFL team has become intertwined with the $715 million Hobart stadium at a time when many are calling for greater investment into health and education.
On Tuesday, Labor MP Shane Broad said Tasmania could simply not afford the new infrastructure, which he estimated would cost the state $20 million a year in interest repayments.
Mr Gutwein said the project would generate more money to spend where "Tasmanians would like it spent", and urged the federal government to provide not just the $240 million needed for Macquarie Point, but the $65 million required to start the seating upgrade at UTAS Stadium.
RELATED: Tasmania deals AFL the upper hand on 19th licence
"It'll provide benefits both in terms of what it'll do for the economy, what it'll do for government revenue," Mr Gutwein said.
"It'll enable us to invest even more into health and into housing because the stadium itself, with a team, will help increase the size of our economy. That's why I've been a strong backer of it.
"I would hope Mr Albanese would see the opportunity to invest in both the stadium in the south, but also importantly to match the state government contribution that's been on the table now for nearly three years into this stadium here."
An artist's impression of the new stadium.
Tasmania's licence was originally set to be decided by a vote of AFL club presidents in August, but has dragged out for nearly half a year since.
In November, the state government and the AFL reached an in-principle agreement for a Tasmanian team, which is understood to be contingent on the Macquarie Point stadium.
The necessity of a new venue, which the Macquarie Point business case reveals to be driven by the existing AFL clubs, has drawn considerable criticism politically and in the community.
Asked whether the stadium project had thrown the AFL bid off course, Mr Gutwein said it had done the opposite.
"I think what it's done is actually ensured that every single president of every other AFL club is now backing our bid," he said.
"They recognise that as we move forward a contemporary stadium, with a roof, is important for the game."
Speaking alongside developer Errol Stewart and Visit Northern Tasmania boss Tracey Mallett, Mr Gutwein urged the state to unite behind the cause.
RELATED: Tasmanian AFL team always linked to new stadium
"I would hope that the parochialism we have seen in this state, that has held it back now for the last 50 years in terms of achieving an AFL team, could be put aside that we can see investment into UTAS, a new stadium being built in Hobart, investment on the North-West Coast, but importantly that once and for all that we can get our own AFL team.
"That will be part of a broader entertainment precinct both in the South, and an opportunity here in the North to have more events as well."


Federal support for a new stadium at Macquarie Point cannot come at the expense of Tasmania's other funding needs, Liberal Senator Jonno Duniam says.

The business case for a $715 million roofed stadium in Hobart is in the hands of the federal government's infrastructure department as the state continues its push for an AFL licence.

The state government is seeking $240 million from federal coffers to fund the stadium, which is understood to be the final hurdle to a Tasmanian licence being awarded.

On Friday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed that his government had begun assessing the project's merits as an AFL stadium and an "urban redevelopment project" similar to that undertaken in Barangaroo, in Sydney.

But the Prime Minister has not yet committed his government to support the proposal financially.

Senator Duniam warned the PM that any federal commitment must not have strings attached.

"If Mr Albanese has the money to fund the stadium, then he should also fund all of the essential services we require in this state," Senator Duniam said.

"Premier Jeremy Rockliff has already indicated (including, in some cases, in writing) to the federal government that Tasmania urgently requires further support for matters like expanded aged care expenditure and NDIS services, as well as more secure health funding.

"The PM and every single Federal Labor MP and Senator must guarantee that, if the stadium is funded, Tasmanians won't be deprived of the things we all need to live."

The Macquarie Point project has become one of the state's hottest political topics since plans for a new stadium, first pencilled in for Regatta Point, were unveiled in March.

Senator Duniam is one of a handful of federal Liberal MPs to voice their opposition to the stadium, which has been heavily criticised by state Labor and the Greens.

Ann McGavin
Why should the average punter have to pay for a new stadium so the AFL/NRL can reap the rewards. They rake in millions from these stadiums and what do they give back???

CLICK ON THE IMAGE TO ENLARGE

PLEASE CLICK ON THE IMAGE TO ENLARGE

PLEASE CLICK ON THE IMAGE TO ENLARGE

PLEASE CLICK ON THE IMAGE TO ENLARGE
Jeremy Rockliff confident Macquarie Point AFL stadium will receive federal funding
SM. By Simon McGuire

Premier Jeremy Rockliff speaking in Devonport following the release of the business case for the proposed AFL stadium. Picture by Eve Woodhouse.
The Premier said the proposed Macquarie Point development is "more than a stadium".

After releasing the business case and discussing it with the Prime Minister, Mr Rockliff described the proposal as "an entire urban renewal project".

"It's an enabler to ensure that we increase our capacity for public transport both on the water and, indeed, the northern suburbs transport corridor as well.

"There are many, many pieces to this Macquarie Point precinct of which can benefit all of Tasmania and truly be iconic for Tasmania."

Mr Rockliff said he was pleased with discussions with Mr Albanese around the project.

"It is a project that I believe we can work very collaboratively with the federal government.

"I had a good hearing yesterday with the Prime Minister, and of course, the Prime Minister was the person when he was Minister for Infrastructure who kicked off the initial investment into Macquarie Point.

"We'll work with the federal government and continue to do so.

Mr Rockliff acknowledged that the stadium had been a divisive issue amongst Tasmanians.

"I know that it's been controversial, of course, and there have been many opinions generated around that.

"But you know, things that are a bit tough...will eventually be, looking back, very good investments for government worth fighting for."

Labor has been a staunch opponent of the stadium, and its finance spokesman Shane Broad was critical of the business case.

"The government have dropped a business case which is really a lump of coal in the Christmas stocking for Tasmanian people."

Dr Broad said the business case was a rehash of old reports.

"But the two new pieces of information is that the state is now up for $460 million, plus the $26 million that was allocated to Macquarie Point, plus the cost of land, so the price has gone up through the roof.

"And the other key piece of information is that the cost-benefit analysis shows that the state of Tasmania will actually be $306 million worse off.

"This project is a turkey once and for all."

Greens leader Cassy O'Connor said there was no business case for the stadium.

"It is absolute folly.

"We've got a Premier who's abdicated his responsibility as Health Minister while he goes begging to Canberra for public money for a stadium we can't afford and don't need.

"The Prime Minister should just say no, in the knowledge most Tasmanians would rather this money be spent on public health and housing."

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the documentation for the stadium was being examined and that he had a constructive meeting with Mr Rockliff.

We, in the past, have put $50 million into Macquarie Point way back in 2012, and since then, there's been very little progress on that site.

"I think this needs to be viewed, though, as how it will transform urban development in that beautiful part of Hobart, in that beautiful state of Tasmania.

"We see urban development...as being very important, and that's the context in which we will examine any proposal."



Click on the image to enlarge

The legislation to establish the authority was passed by Parliament earlier this year.

At next week's Council meeting, Councillors will vote whether to accept the proposal to transfer ownership of UTAS Stadium to Stadiums Tasmania - a decision that could save the Council more than $3 million a year in operating costs.

Mayor Danny Gibson said if Councillors voted in the affirmative, Council will be required to open a 21-day public objection period as required by the Local Government Act before the transfer can be finalised.

"Any objections we receive during that time must be formally considered by the Councillors at a future meeting," Mayor Gibson said.

The Council will also vote to subdivide the land to remove the bowls green and associated facilities, which do not form part of the transfer to Stadiums Tasmania. The decision before council will also include the transfer of all current employees and their full entitlements.

Mayor Gibson said the proposal to transfer the Stadium to the State Government was first flagged during the development of the City of Launceston's UTAS Stadium Future Directions Plan, which was endorsed by the Council in February 2021.

"The Plan identified that UTAS Stadium was approaching a pivotal period for its future as a number of factors converged to cause the Council to reflect and review its future ownership and governance structures, together with its future development needs," Mayor Gibson said.

"Substantial future capital investment is required, which is being driven by factors such as increasing compliance requirements, increasing user expectations as well as community sport and recreation needs."

Mayor Gibson said the Council also identified that it was not appropriate to continue operating a Tier 2 Stadium with the current operational model.

"The current approach inhibits the Stadium’s ability to act commercially and be responsive and flexible in decision-making," he said. "By that, I mean it doesn't allow us the ability to operate with independence and fails to recognise that the management of major sports venues is highly specialised and distinct from the traditional roles of government and departments."

Mayor Gibson said the establishment of Stadiums Tasmania represents a move to a more contemporary and fit-for-purpose ownership and governance structure for the State's major stadiums, which have been place for major stadiums in mainland states for a number of years.

"If Council votes to approve the asset transfer to Stadiums Tasmania, it will not only result in savings to Council of between $3 million a year and up to $5 million when the average capital expenditure is taken into account, but it will also ensure that the Stadium itself remains in public hands and available events such as AFL games, Big Bash matches and any other content such as music concerts and the like," Mayor Gibson said.

"The other benefit for Launceston residents is that it mean Council will be able to reallocate those funds to other really important community projects, which I would expect to be welcomed by our ratepayers."

 Tagged as:  Media Releases

CLICK HERE TO GO TO THE SOURCE





By Alison Foletta. Updated December 10 2022 - 11:05am, first published 9:00am

UTAS Stadium or York Park ownership may be passed on to government body Stadiums Tasmania.

York Park may soon no longer be an asset of City of Launceston council.

The City of Launceston will formally vote on the transfer ownership of University of Tasmania Stadium at its ordinary meeting next Thursday.

At the last State election, then-Premier Peter Gutwein announced a plan to establish a statutory authority - Stadiums Tasmania - to oversee the management of Tasmania's major sporting facilities, including UTAS Stadium, the Silverdome and Blundstone Arena.

The legislation to establish the authority was passed by Parliament earlier this year.

At next week's council meeting, councillors will vote whether to accept the proposal to transfer ownership of UTAS Stadium to Stadiums Tasmania - a decision that could save the council more than $3 million a year in operating costs.

Mayor Danny Gibson said if councillors voted in the affirmative, the council will be required to open a 21-day public objection period as required by the Local Government Act before the transfer can be finalised.

"Any objections we receive during that time must be formally considered by the councillors at a future meeting," Cr Gibson said.

The council will also vote to subdivide the land to remove the bowls green and associated facilities, which do not form part of the transfer to Stadiums Tasmania. The decision before council will also include the transfer of all current employees and their full entitlements.

Cr Gibson said the proposal to transfer the Stadium to the State Government was first flagged during the development of the City of Launceston's UTAS Stadium Future Directions Plan, which was endorsed by the Council in February 2021.

"The plan identified that UTAS Stadium was approaching a pivotal period for its future as a number of factors converged to cause the council to reflect and review its future ownership and governance structures, together with its future development needs," Cr Gibson said.

"Substantial future capital investment is required, which is being driven by factors such as increasing compliance requirements, increasing user expectations as well as community sport and recreation needs."

No comments:

Post a Comment